A Sukhoi Sukhoi Superjet 100-95, registration RA-97004 performing a demonstration flight from Jakarta Halim Perdanakusuma Airport to Jakarta Halim Perdanakusuma Airport (Indonesia) with 36 passengers, 6 crew and 2 Sukhoi officials, was enroute near Mount Salak and Bogor about 36nm south of Jakarta about 30 minutes into the flight when the radio contact with the aircraft was lost. The aircraft has not turned up at Jakarta or any other airport in the area and would have run out of fuel by now.
No ELT signal has been located so far.
Jakarta - The aircraft was on a demonstration flight in Jakarta when it went off radar screens on Wednesday. 44 people are on board including 8 Russians and 36 foreigners.
Ria Novosti states that a high-altitude crash or possible hijacking have not been ruled out by officials. The plane did not return to the airport at the scheduled time. Apparently by that time, fuel would have been totally spent. An Indonesian aviation official stated that shortly before going off radar, the crew had asked for permission to descend. Permitted was granted to descend from an altitude of 10,000 feet down to 6,000 - moving down in a rightward direction. The official states that there is a 6,200-foot high mountain in the area where the plane has gone missing, about 40 nautical miles from Jakarta airport. While the plane could have crashed, Indonesian authorities have not yet ruled out the possibility that it was hijacked. Of the 44 people on the aircraft, 8 are Russian nationals and 36 are foreign nationals, mostly representing major airline companies. The crew of the aircraft are Russian. Later reports stated that no one on board can be reached via telephone. The Sukhoi SuperJet-100 is on an Asian demonstrative tour including 6 countries. The plane arrived in Indonesia on May 9, which is the fourth stop on its tour. Previously the aircraft visited Myanmar, Pakistan and Kazakhstan. Following Jakarta, the tour was supposed to continue in Laos and Vietnam. There were two previous half-hour demonstration flights in Jakarta with the first taking representatives from VEB-Leasing and a Russian insurance agency. The second demonstration took potential buyers including representatives of Indonesia's Batavia, Pelita, Air Aviastar and Sriwijaya Air. Latest update: Helicopters have been sent out to look for the aircraft with no success.
Indonesian Authorities reported the aircraft was enroute at 10,000 feet near Mount Salak when at about 15:30L (08:30Z) the crew requested and was cleared to descend to 6,000 feet. This proved to be the last radio transmission. Radar contact was lost when the aircraft was in a right hand turn descending through 6,200 feet. A search operation has been initiated and is mounting, first search flights have not yet found any trace of the aircraft. The search flights are currently suspended due to nightfall in Indonesia.
Mount Salak is 2,211 meters/7254 feet high, nearby Mount Gede is 2,958 meters/9,705 feet high.
At 15:30L the local weatherstation in Bogor reported visibility at 9000 meters (increasing to 10000 meters in the next reading), temperature at 31 degrees C, dew point at 25 degrees C, humidity 70% and winds arund 5 knots from northeast, no precipitation. In the morning the weatherstation had reported low visibility around about 2000 meters.
Re Paul
By Cpt Pam on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:48Z
"I've had ATC almost vector me into a mountain going into Halim one day"
You must be one of Ibu Susi's guys, yes have to be careful with Halim ATC; a few stories came to my attention recently. Anyway Ibu Susi is lucky to have some real talent flying with her.
SU95 missing in Indonesia
By ZoSo on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:45Z
Russian news agencies are busy with Red Army military parade taking place today on Red Square
ATC
By Paul on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:43Z
I've had ATC almost vector me into a mountain going into Halim one day.
ATC and others...
By JP on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:38Z
We may question ATC decision, but there are other things that have to be checked as well:
1. Flight plan considering terrain conditions (it was demo flight, so it could be improvised)
2. Situational awareness of pilots incl. flight conditions (VFC?)
3. Was it special demo machine or standard operational a/c?
Therefore EGPWS present? working? other avionics?
4. Last not least - technical issue bringing the plane down(tech problems, birds ingestion, etc.)
As you can see from points 1-3, lack of planning/flying skills
MIGHT BE the issue.
However don't blame ATC or pilots too soon. My thoughts are with all on board.
Crash
By Cpt Pamela on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:36Z
Hmmm descent to 6000 feet in that area. Did Halim ATC clear that?
What about GPWS?? Seems flight crew was pre-occupied. Sad news here in Indonesia!
Pam
Local witness
By Didi on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:27Z
No further news on this missing plane so far.
But a local farmer said that around 4 PM, he saw a plane fly at low altitude, coming from Mt. Salak and then turn right toward Jasinga area (see the map). Provide the witness is correct, it means that, perhaps, at least the plane does not hit the mountain. Hope everything is OK with them all.
By (anonymous) on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:25Z
A demonstration flight? Aircraft missing? Wow I think Sukhoi could be closing soon. There goes Michael O'Leary's 'plans' of buying them.
Terrain clearance is the PICs responsibility, not ATCs AFAIK. But I won't speculate.
Hope they find them.
CFIT
By (anonymous) on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:18Z
Cfit is and remains human error, normally done by pilots but many times also atc gives some crazy clearances.
No EGPWS?
By Sydy on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:15Z
Gents,
If... And it is just a if... If you are correct and it is a cfit, doesn't it have EGPWS?
What kind of avionics does it have? Sounds like poor...
Let's wait...
My condolences to all involved,
Sydy
EGPWS
By Jeropiga on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:13Z
It could have been a CFIT... but... what about EGPWS warnings? The EGPWS is essentialy build to prevent such acidents...
By @ anonymous on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:05Z
CFIT = controlled flight into terrain
aircraft has no malfunction at time of impact
crew is just not aware of the situation and what they are doing
By (anonymous) on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:03Z
ATC has a roll to play with possible warning them, however if a plane / crew want to decend into an area were mountains are above them its down to them, ATC clear (no other traffic issues etc) them down, I would have thought that giving a warning along the lines of are you sure? amy giving a bit of a heads up regarding heights of peaks in the area would be expected from atc.
we dont know really what happened with if it, was it request to decend, or what was said, also having a inflight emergency in the area may also have caused a aproblem and distraction.,
Not enough is known yet to be sure,
VFR
By Sandro on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:02Z
Bad news, keeping the fingers crossed too! It would be interesting to know if this flight was performed under VFR? If yes, was visibility sufficient within the mountains?
By (anonymous) on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 12:00Z
CFIT Controlled flight into terrain
CFIT
By Jof on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 11:58Z
CFIT is Controlled Flight Into Terrain. A distinct possibility when flying amongst the mountains rather than over them.
Distress call
By James Atkinson on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 11:58Z
Al Jazeera English is reporting that the aircraft issued a distress call before radar and radio contact was lost.
They don't offer a verified source for that tidbit, however. Doesn't appear to be Russian news agency Ria Novosti, which is the source for other parts of the Al Jazeera story.
CFIT
By Hendrik on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 11:58Z
Controlled Flight Into Terrain
By (anonymous) on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 11:55Z
What is 'CFIT' ??
By (anonymous) on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 11:51Z
if it was cleared to 6000 feet, there was ATC. With ATC, how is a CFIT possible? Isnt it atc mistake? then i also wonder, what the GPWS is there for.
By (anonymous) on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 11:37Z
If it was CFIT as i sitting in my DIY crash investigation chair in my office thinks, the for Sukhoi the only negative would be the competance of their pilots and SOP regarding joy rides, sorry demo flights.
it could have been any plane type therefore the fact its a Sukhoi is no factor in this incident.
Although if the same attention and competance that this flight crew have exhibited had it been CFIT is anything to go by it will influance peoples option of Sukhoi as a whole oganisation.
and therefore damage its credabilty as a safe outfit.
By Hook on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 11:37Z
Oh no. So sad. i'll keep my fingers crossed.
By Tim on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 11:29Z
As usual we should wait for the investigation, but in my opinion it was a CFIT.
1. Aircraft was in the vicinity of Mount Salak (7500 ft) and Mount Gede (9000 ft).
2. Aircraft was cleared to descend to 6000 feet.
3. Last radar contact was at 6200 feet.
I think they perished in the mountains. Makes not a good impression of the new Sukhoi Jet. Moreover it was a demonstration flight!
re:Superbuggg
By Al on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 11:15Z
You are right :)
My prayers go out to them
By (anonymous) on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 11:12Z
44 people
By Superbuggg on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 11:04Z
This is not good FOR THE 46 PEOPLE ON BOARD!
CFIT
By leon on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 10:58Z
sounds alot like CFIT ...
By Al on Wednesday, May 9th 2012 10:37Z
This is not good for Sukhoi.